[laws/_private/bankruptcy_lawyers.htm]New York State Common Law Marriage
Based upon prior US traditions, when a man and a woman began living
together and publicly stated they married, over a period ranging from 5
to 15 years (depending upon the state of jurisdiction), state law
generally deemed them to be husband and wife for all legal purposes.
Putative husbands frequently were required to pay alimony based upon the
testimony of his companion, and perhaps the testimony of a few of her
friends. Because of the potential for abuse, few states now recognize
common law marriages. In bankruptcy court, the law of the state of
residency determines marital relation and the nature of the bankruptcy
estate, bankruptcy exemptions, and the discharge of debts through
bankruptcy.
In practice - New York State common law marriage
prohibition
Consider an example. A man and woman arrive at their vacation
destination and check in to a hotel under the name of Mr. and Ms. Doe.
They have now represented to the world they are husband and wife, even
if neither of them is named Doe. If they do this twice, during any 5
year period, the woman potentially could sue for alimony based on
written documentation of their common law marriage. Or, should could
claim a double exemption of property in bankruptcy, in favor of her
newly identified husband. New York common law
marriage was abolished for this reason, to stop the flood of frivolous
claims for divorce.
The US Bankruptcy Code generously incorporates New York
State statutory laws into the administration of Chapter 7 liquidation, Chapter 13
plans,
and Chapter 11 reorganization cases. The application of State Law in
Federal Court is essential for resolving legal issues pertaining to the
ownership of property, debtor and creditor rights, employment law and
employee rights, enforcement of judgments, determinations of liability,
family obligations, and many more individual rights when dealing with
large corporations. Each year, as the State Legislature in Albany enacts
new statutes, or amends existing statutes, the ripple effect impacts all
New York citizens' rights in Federal Bankruptcy Court.
Amendments contained in New York State statutory law can dramatically affect
the administration of bankruptcy cases and determination of assets subject to
seizure and also affect the dischargeability of debts. Notice the following
recent changes in bankruptcy practices throughout the state:
- A New York City corporate litigation law firm and New York City business dispute lawyers
recently teamed up to claim unpaid executive compensation packages are
entitled to priority payment before distribution of assets to general
employees or creditors in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
- After bankruptcy, the same New York City litigation lawyers and team of New York business dispute lawsuit lawyers
also claimed that their attorney fees should a even higher priority,
above payment of salaries to employees.
- Similarly, a team of New York City corporate litigation lawyers
and New York property damage litigation lawyers claimed a pending,
contingent class action suit must be funded, with proceeds held in
trust, before payment of claims to general unsecured creditors in
bankruptcy cases.
- The same New York corporate litigation law firm and New York law firm
dispute litigation lawyers also claimed, that attorney fees in class action
suits, even though the defendant is in bankruptcy, are not required to bear a logical relationship to potential
benefits, if any, for plaintiffs included within the designated class
of victims. Theses New York City law firm dispute litigation lawyers
were not successful.
Back to New York State
Statutory Law information index.
|